Prediction of Murphy Cassone [218th] vs Christian Sigsgaard [550th] Head-to-Head At The 1970
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W W L W L L L W
Form
L W W W W W L W W LHead-To-Head: Cassone 0 - 0 Sigsgaard
| Cassone | Stats | Sigsgaard |
|---|---|---|
| 64% (18-10) | YTD Win/Loss | 73% (8-3) |
| 0 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 218 | Ranking | 550 |
| 218 | Highest Rank | 545 |
| 22 | Age | 28 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 2 | Titles | 2 |
| 62% (84-52) | Career Total W/L | 64% (112-63) |
| $3,650 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 1 |
| 0 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
No H2H Matches Available
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Murphy Cassone vs Christian Sigsgaard Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Cassone 0 - 0 Sigsgaard
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Cassone has won 49.35% of points on their second serve, while Sigsgaard has won 42.35%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Cassone, in recent form, has won 44.78% of their opponent's second serve points, while Sigsgaard has won 45.07%. The same stats for first serve returns are 25.61% and 26.02% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Cassone has saved 54.25% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Sigsgaard has saved 52.98% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Cassone has won 64.79% of matches played (W/L 46/ 25), with Sigsgaard winning 69.7% (W/L 23/ 10) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Cassone has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 71% (W/L 35/ 14), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 33% (W/L 1/ 2). Sigsgaard has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 66% (W/L 27/ 14), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Cassone has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 66% of matches (W/L 33/ 17), where as Sigsgaard has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 72.41% of matches (W/L 21/ 8). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Cassone has played against opponents with an average rank of 253.14 while Sigsgaard has played against players with an average rank of 159.03.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Cassone has won 56% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Sigsgaard has won 67% in all matches played on tour.
- Current event H2H stats: Past player performance is very useful in predicting tennis matches, but once an event is under way we should also look at current event stats for in form player indication, so check the section below (if they have played a match in the current event). Some players also perform better at certain events and this should be taken into account when picking the outcome.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Cassone has converted 25.76% of breakpoint opportunities, and Sigsgaard has converted 28.75% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Murphy Cassone vs Christian Sigsgaard Best Odds For The Match
Murphy Cassone Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Murphy Cassone
Player
Eliot Spizzirri
57%
(
44 of
77)
1st Serve %
60%
(
52 of
86)
7
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
6
68%
(
30 of
44)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
38%
(
29 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
41 of
86)
89
Total Points Won
74
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mathys Erhard
Player
Murphy Cassone
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve %
74%
(
49 of
66)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
0
67%
(
22 of
33)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
20 of
49)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
39%
(
19 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
39 of
66)
69
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Robin Catry
Player
Murphy Cassone
71%
(
44 of
62)
1st Serve %
59%
(
34 of
58)
8
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
7
75%
(
33 of
44)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
25 of
34)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
27%
(
17 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
24 of
58)
69
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Thiago Agustin Tirante
Player
Murphy Cassone
50%
(
52 of
104)
1st Serve %
64%
(
55 of
86)
10
Aces
9
5
Double Faults
9
81%
(
42 of
52)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
45 of
55)
62%
(
32 of
52)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
29%
(
30 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
26 of
86)
100
Total Points Won
90
|
6-3 6-7(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Murphy Cassone
Player
Elmar Ejupovic
71%
(
51 of
72)
1st Serve %
66%
(
60 of
91)
10
Aces
13
8
Double Faults
4
82%
(
42 of
51)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
41 of
60)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
28%
(
20 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
39 of
91)
91
Total Points Won
72
|
4-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Raphael Collignon
Player
Murphy Cassone
63%
(
59 of
94)
1st Serve %
73%
(
80 of
109)
6
Aces
10
9
Double Faults
3
80%
(
47 of
59)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
60 of
80)
57%
(
20 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
17%
(
2 of
12)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
29%
(
27 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
39 of
109)
106
Total Points Won
97
|
7-6(3) 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Murphy Cassone
Player
Luca Van Assche
74%
(
76 of
103)
1st Serve %
62%
(
56 of
90)
10
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
2
67%
(
51 of
76)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
41 of
56)
41%
(
11 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
68%
(
23 of
34)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
40%
(
41 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
26 of
90)
88
Total Points Won
105
|
7-6(2) 0-6 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Murphy Cassone
Player
Hugo Grenier
74%
(
76 of
103)
1st Serve %
64%
(
47 of
74)
11
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
3
72%
(
55 of
76)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
35 of
47)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
78%
(
21 of
27)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
34%
(
35 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
24%
(
18 of
74)
86
Total Points Won
91
|
7-6(7) 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Murphy Cassone
Player
Ricardas Berankis
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve %
51%
(
21 of
41)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
6
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
73%
(
8 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
21%
(
9 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
20 of
41)
53
Total Points Won
30
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF | w/o | H2H | |||
view more
Christian Sigsgaard Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Christian Sigsgaard
Player
Alex Rybakov
67%
(
61 of
91)
1st Serve %
69%
(
75 of
108)
0
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
1
66%
(
40 of
61)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
46 of
75)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
37%
(
34 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
41 of
108)
98
Total Points Won
101
|
3-6 7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Christian Sigsgaard
Player
Pedro Sakamoto
55%
(
52 of
94)
1st Serve %
57%
(
43 of
75)
3
Aces
6
7
Double Faults
1
75%
(
39 of
52)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
33 of
43)
52%
(
22 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
35%
(
33 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
29 of
75)
90
Total Points Won
79
|
6-7(8) 6-4 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Genaro Alberto Olivieri
Player
Christian Sigsgaard
80%
(
48 of
60)
1st Serve %
58%
(
38 of
65)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
63%
(
30 of
48)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
38%
(
23 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
35 of
65)
72
Total Points Won
53
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Christian Sigsgaard
Player
Daniil Glinka
61%
(
23 of
38)
1st Serve %
78%
(
28 of
36)
3
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
0
78%
(
18 of
23)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
32%
(
12 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
44
Total Points Won
30
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Christian Sigsgaard
Player
Marvin Moeller
54%
(
45 of
84)
1st Serve %
64%
(
45 of
70)
4
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
4
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
30 of
45)
62%
(
24 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
31 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
28 of
70)
81
Total Points Won
73
|
6-3 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Christian Sigsgaard
Player
Dennis Novak
58%
(
35 of
60)
1st Serve %
56%
(
31 of
55)
4
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
1
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
22 of
31)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
35%
(
21 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
24 of
55)
63
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Christian Sigsgaard
Player
Alessandro Pecci
59%
(
30 of
51)
1st Serve %
63%
(
35 of
56)
3
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
4
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
76%
(
16 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
27%
(
14 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
27 of
56)
64
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Christian Sigsgaard
Player
Nino Serdarusic
62%
(
36 of
58)
1st Serve %
68%
(
50 of
74)
9
Aces
10
3
Double Faults
1
89%
(
32 of
36)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
35 of
50)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
24%
(
14 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
30 of
74)
74
Total Points Won
58
|
7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Norbert Gombos
Player
Christian Sigsgaard
63%
(
42 of
67)
1st Serve %
58%
(
41 of
71)
10
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
2
86%
(
36 of
42)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
32 of
41)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
17 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
23 of
71)
73
Total Points Won
65
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Where To Watch Cassone vs Sigsgaard?
When the match starts we will have live scores and stats on this page. For live streaming at TV channels of this match, see our ATP and WTA worldwide viewing pages. Free trial live streaming of Cassone Vs Sigsgaard is now available here.
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 62% (84/52) | Win/Loss | 64% (112/63) |
| 60% (190/129) | Sets Win/Loss | 63% (250/146) |
| 54% (1631/1412) | Games Win/Loss | 56% (2057/1640) |
| 0.46 | Aces Per Game | 0.21 |
| 685 | Aces Total | 383 |
| 0.25 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.14 |
| 367 | Total Double Faults | 248 |
| 1:29:23 | Average Match Time | 1:12:29 |
| 242.54 | Average Opponent Rank | 214.53 |
| 64% (5387/8447) | 1st Serve % | 66% (5666/8541) |
| 72% (3867/5387) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (3809/5666) |
| 51% (1562/3059) | 2nd Serve Win % | 53% (1517/2875) |
| 42% (328/774) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 48% (445/925) |
| 39% (3279/8419) | Return Points Win % | 43% (3739/8749) |
| 62% (83/133) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 64% (107/168) |
| 0% (0/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 75% (3/4) |
| 50% (23/46) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 55% (24/44) |
| 54% (25/46) | Deciding Set Win % | 40% (17/43) |
| 87% (82/71) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (116/101) |
| 13% (82/11) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (116/15) |
| 24% (54/13) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 19% (59/11) |
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Murphy Cassone
View full predicted draw for Cassone
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
